Insurers seek to define Arab Spring damage as claims may top US$500 million
Source: BI-ME with Bloomberg , Author: Posted by BI-ME staff
Posted: Thu September 1, 2011 5:36 pm

INTERNATIONAL. As the Arab Spring gained momentum this year, the initial protests in Cairo's Tahrir Square constituted civil commotion, in the parlance of the global insurance industry.

When demonstrators demanded that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak step down, they crossed into insurrection. After soldiers sided with the people, the military engaged in mutiny.

Such semantics may feel like distinctions without a difference. For underwriters in the specialty market of political-violence insurance, though, they’re crucial, Bloomberg Businessweek reports in its September 5 issue.

Providers such as Hiscox Ltd. (HSX) and Lancashire Holdings Ltd., based in Bermuda, typically sell coverage from a menu that starts with sabotage and terrorism and moves through such perils as “strikes, riots, and civil commotion,” insurrection and outright war.

The problem is that events on the ground can be difficult to define. As incidents progress from one classification of political violence to another, insurers and insured don’t always agree on whether property damage should be covered.

Although brokers and underwriters rarely discuss specific cases, total claims arising from the Arab Spring may top US$500 million, said Andrew van den Born, an executive director at broker Willis Group Holdings Plc (WSH) in London. Disagreements over how to label the turmoil may mean insurers will be reluctant to pay many of those claims, people in the business say.

“This type of coverage lends itself to disputes,” said Daniel Wagner, chief executive officer of consulting firm Country Risk Solutions. “‘Was there a fire in your home?’ is a yes-or-no question,” he said. “‘Was this a riot or an insurrection?’ is not nearly as clear.”

More than 60% of 1,382 companies and other organizations surveyed by insurance broker Marsh & McLennan Cos. buy terrorism insurance. Last year, the survey found, insurance companies were willing to underwrite US$3.8 billion in such coverage globally.

Since many governments in the Middle East had enjoyed long tenures, multinationals and local companies alike typically insured themselves against sabotage, terrorism, and civil commotion but rarely against graver perils such as insurrections or war. Rates have climbed this year as the turmoil boosted demand for policies covering more serious upheavals, brokers and underwriters say.

“In Bahrain, prices went up 400%-500% overnight,” said David A. Austin, CEO of Visionary Underwriting Agency of Dubai. “In Syria, prices went sky-high.”

For decades, insurers considered insurrection and war too risky to cover. Before Sept. 11, 2001, terrorism was included in standard property-loss policies except in high-risk countries such as Colombia and Sri Lanka.

After the attacks, reinsurers such as Munich Re and Swiss Re Ltd. -- which write broad policies to cover the risks taken on by smaller insurance companies -- started to exclude terrorism from property coverage, opening up a separate market for terrorism insurance. As companies assessed the risks in many countries, they started buying coverage for other kinds of political violence.

Disputes over those policies arise when incidents shift from one type of political violence to another. When Hezbollah fired rockets into Israel in 2006, an Israeli company submitted a terrorism claim for property damage caused by the attacks. The insurer balked, arguing that by the time the destruction occurred the conflict had become a war, several people in the industry said. The claim was ultimately settled privately, said Charles Berry, chairman of Berry, Palmer, & Lyle, a London broker not involved in the case.

“The claims weren’t that big, and the account was very profitable,” Berry said.

The pick-and-choose approach to political-violence insurance was tested again last year when the Thai government called protests in central Bangkok acts of terrorism. That definition has led to about 100 disputed claims, according to the General Insurance Association, a Thai trade group.

The owners of the CentralWorld mall had terrorism insurance and expect to recoup damages. Another mall, Center One, had coverage for strikes, riots, and civil commotion -- but not terrorism. The mall’s management said its insurer is refusing to pay a claim for 120 million baht (US$4 million).

Given the hodgepodge of policies in the Middle East, similar issues will surely arise from events there. Julie Martin, a political risk insurance broker at Marsh, said a new client asked her to evaluate a political-violence claim from the region on a policy sold by another broker.

“The claim didn’t fit with the events that occurred,” said Martin. Though she helped submit the claim, she said she told the client, “There is no way that the underwriter will pay.”

 

MIDDLE EAST BUSINESS COMMENT & ANALYSIS

date:Posted: December 18, 2014
UAE. The level of consumer trust in insurers is 52%, compared to 73% for supermarkets, and 71% for banks; 32% in UAE and 49% in KSA likely to switch insurers in the next 12 months.
date:Posted: December 17, 2014
INTERNATIONAL. Russians don't respond to economic pressure as Westerners do. Sanctions reflect European and American thresholds of pain. They are designed to cause pain that the West could not withstand. Applied to others, the effects may vary.
date:Posted: December 17, 2014
SAUDI ARABIA. In general, the lack of certainty regarding damages means the litigation risk is significantly higher in Saudi Arabia compared with other jurisdictions. In comparison, however, the level of damages awards remains much lower.
dhgate